月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
直接被害人死亡後之懲罰性賠償金的請求主體研究──以美國《遺存訴因法》及《不當致死法》之規範為鑑
並列篇名
A Study on the Claimant of Punitive Damages After the Death of a Direct Victim: Lessons from the Survival Statutes and Wrongful Death Statutes of the United States
作者 戴志傑
中文摘要 企業經營者之瑕疵產品或服務致被害人受有損害,其懲罰性賠償金責任實不因該人之死亡而免除,如此方能落實該賠償金的制度目的。然因民法第6條之故,及消費者保護法第7條、第51條的規定不備,即衍生「致被害人當場死亡的侵權行為應否受懲罰性賠償金及請求主體究屬何人」的爭議,且迄今無論是司法判決或學者論著或彼此間仍是見解分歧。對此,本文在研究美國遺存訴因法與不當致死法之規定後,重新檢視我國法上關於僅致財損或非財損、致傷、致當場或嗣後死亡等侵權行為,於被害人訴訟前或訴訟中死亡時,是否存有及究屬何人係為懲罰性賠償金請求主體的問題,並對各種論述意見予以回應。最後,本文以為此一問題唯有修法一途,從而於文末提出具體草案條文,以供日後修法時參考。
英文摘要 When a business owner provides defective products or services that cause damage to the victim, his/her punitive damages liability should not be extinguished when the person is dead; thus, the purpose of the punitive damages system can be implemented. However, the dispute on “Should the action of tort that caused the death of the victim on the spot receive punitive damages? And who is the subject of the request?” is derived due to the inadequate provisions in Article 6 of the Civil Code as well as Article 7 and Article 51 of the Consumer Protection Act. Up to now, different opinions still remain in judicial judgments, scholars’ writings or each other. By understanding the provisions of the survival statutes and wrongful death statutes in the U.S., this study attempts to reexamine the action of tort concerning the cause of pecuniary loss, the cause of non-pecuniary loss, the cause of injuries, the cause of death on the spot, and subsequent death in the laws of our country in order to clarify whether the subject of the request for punitive damages truly exists and who it will be, and respond to various opinions. Finally, in this study, it is believed the only solution is to amend the law so as to preserve the cause of action for the deceased, create a cause of action for the successor, or stipulate consumer protection groups for estate administrator when there is no successor. As a result, a consumer lawsuit can be filed to request punitive damages for the benefit of the deceased, which would be the right direction.
起訖頁 123-213
關鍵詞 侵權行為遺存訴因法不當致死法承受訴訟填補性賠償金懲罰性賠償金消費者保護法TortSurvival StatutesWrongful Death StatutesAssumption of ActionCompensatory DamagesPunitive damagesConsumer Protection Act
刊名 政大法學評論
出版單位 國立政治大學法律學系
期數 202206 (169期)
DOI 10.53106/102398202022060169003  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄