|
|
||
|
| 篇名 | 【預刊】(38卷)惹人爭議的學習歷程檔案:審議如何可能避免夢幻文件 |
|---|---|
| 並列篇名 | Why E-Portfolio Is Controversial: How Deliberation May Avoid a Fantasy Document |
| 作者 | 林祐聖 |
| 中文摘要 | 學習歷程檔案的運作引起諸多的批評,從夢幻文件的概念出發,本文探究兩個問題。首先,為何一個具有豐富資源的組織,會制定在象徵上能夠解決當前的教育難題,卻不易在實際上達成目標的計畫。其次,審議討論能否成為降低計畫的夢幻性的方式。以「未來議起來」為案例,本文發現,夢幻計畫的成因在於組織對於問題的不知,審議討論可擴充對於問題的掌握,增加計畫的實用性並提升參與者對於組織的信心。雖然審議外包能在短期降低計畫的夢幻性,組織仍應該培養民主創新能力,改變組織制定計劃的體質,常態化的減少政策的夢幻程度。 |
| 英文摘要 | The E-Portfolio (EP) is a controversial reform of senior high school education. This study explored two puzzles from the perspective of a fantasy document. First, why does a resourceful organization create a plan with high symbolic meaning but low instrumental function? Second, is deliberation a cure for avoiding a fan-tasy document? Taking the deliberation plan on EP as a case study, this study argues that a fantasy document results from an organization’s lack of familiarity with the issue and its inability to obtain sufficient information. This study argues that deliberation is an efficient tool for enhancing the symbolic and pragmatic functions of plans. While outsourcing deliberation can decrease the fantasy of the plan in a short period, this study suggests that the organization should be more actively involved in the deliberation process to develop democratic innovation capacity and transform the configuration of plan-making within the organization. |
| 起訖頁 | 1-43 |
| 關鍵詞 | 夢幻文件、審議民主、學習歷程檔案、108課綱、未來議起來、fantasy document、deliberative democracy、e-portfolio、Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education、conversation for future |
| 刊名 | 人文及社會科學集刊 |
| 出版單位 | 中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心(原:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所) |
| 期數 | 預刊 (37-39卷期) |
| DOI | 10.53106/1018189X202407002 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode | |