月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
逃漏稅捐處罰法制改革——實證研究之觀點
並列篇名
Legal Liabilities on Tax Evasion
作者 黃湘婷林志潔
中文摘要 逃漏稅捐為常見犯罪型態之一,此行為毋寧是對稅捐法制的違背以及對公平競爭環境的破壞。逃漏稅捐的處罰,有行政罰以及刑罰兩種,本文將介紹此兩種處罰體制之差別,舉凡適用的時機、處罰的強度等等。並透過文獻回顧、判決分析以及訪談相關實務工作者,以了解現行逃漏稅捐處罰體制在實務運作所面臨的困境以及難題。本文發現,由於一行為不二罰原理之適用以及實務上對於逃漏稅犯罪構成要件認定之限縮,大大削弱了刑事處罰對於逃漏稅捐犯罪的嚇阻力。最後,本文建議應強化逃漏稅捐刑罰強度,並彌補構成要件認定上的缺口,期能使現況下的逃漏稅捐處罰體制的漏洞有所改善。
英文摘要 Tax evasion is a common kind of crime that sabotages the taxation system and the fair competition of commerce. Tax payers who commit tax evasion might have criminal or administrative liability, with which the difference will be explained in this thesis. With literature reviews, case studies and interviewing with judge, prosecutor, and taxation administrator, the system of punishment for tax evasion as long as dilemmas it encountered are presented. The results revealed that the application of Double Jeopardy and the constrained legal elements of offence have been crippled the criminal liability of tax evasion which is enacted in article 41 of Tax Collection Act. The study suggests to reinforce criminal punishment and extend the scope of legal elements of the offence, in order to amend the weakness of criminal liability of tax evasion.
起訖頁 1-28
關鍵詞 逃漏稅捐稅捐行政罰稅捐刑罰一行為不二罰Tax EvasionCriminal LiabilityAdministrative LiabilityDouble Jeopardy
刊名 月旦財經法雜誌
出版單位 元照出版公司
期數 201905 (44期)
DOI 10.3966/1815008X2019050044001  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄