月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
篇名
立法不溯既往的憲法界線──真正和非真正溯及概念的釐清
並列篇名
The Constitutional Limit to Ex Post Facto Legislation - The Dividing Line of Realand Unreal Retroactivity
作者 蘇永欽
中文摘要 法律不溯既往是法治國原則非常重要的內涵,但另一方面國家也需要為推動民意要求的改革保有足夠的行動空間,此一信賴保護和推動改革之間的矛盾就成了憲法必須處理的問題。我國憲法實務就此主要參考德國的憲法教義學去區分真正和非真正溯及,因此檢視了德國憲法法院和我國大法官相關的實務,據以對年金改革有關公務員退休金減領的部分去做憲法的評價,結論是已經構成溯及,因而違憲。
英文摘要 The prohibition of ex post facto laws is a very essential part of rule of law. But thestate needs, on the other hand, enough room to be active making reforms desired by thepeople. The antinomy between protection of trust and making social reforms becomes aconstitutional issue to be coped with. Relying on the German constitutional dogmatics ourconstitutional jurisprudence differs between real and unreal retroacivity. Following thisline the author, after examing the practice of both German and Taiwan’s practice of theConstitutional Courts, comes to the conclusion that the reform law of the civil servant’spension, for the part reducing the monthly pay for the retired, is retroactive and thusunconstitutional.
起訖頁 5-22
關鍵詞 立法不溯既往真正溯及不真正溯及年金改革Ex Post Facto LawReal RetroactivityUnreal RetroactivityPension Reform
刊名 月旦法學雜誌
出版單位 元照出版公司
期數 201901 (284期)
DOI 10.3966/102559312019010284001  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄