月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
員警槍擊拒捕通緝犯的正當防衛爭議──評最高法院105年度台非字第88號刑事判決與其歷審裁判
並列篇名
Self Defense Concerning Deadly Weapon Use of Police: A Case Study of the 2016 Supreme Court Criminal Decision Taifei Zi No. 88
作者 許恒達
中文摘要 本文以一則最高法院廣受注意的實務判決為中心,討論警察開槍阻止拒捕通緝犯逃亡時,不小心致令其死亡的案例,其中關涉的議題包括「警察執法行為時可否主張正當防衛?」、「侵害行為有無應該事前或事後判定?」與「誤想防衛的法律效果為何?如何判斷是否成立過失犯?」,筆者認為這些問題都關涉我國正當防衛解釋適用問題的核心,可以透過本案判決的評釋而得到較具合理的答案。
英文摘要 This article focuses on a high-profile judgment of the Supreme Court and discusses a scenario in which the fugitive was shot to death by police when resisting arrest. Issues involved therein include “whether the police can assert self-defense during law enforcement”, “should the injurious act be determined in advance or afterwards,” and “what’s the legal consequence of putative self-defense? How to determine the constitution of a negligent crime?” The author opines that all of the above questions concern the core problems of how to apply and interpret “self-defense” and can be reasonably answered in light of the foregoing judgement.
起訖頁 22-42
關鍵詞 正當防衛誤想防衛防衛情狀依法令之行為警械使用條例Self DefensePutative DefenseApparent Threat of Unlawful and Immediate ViolenceConduct Performed in Accordance With LawAct Governing the Use of Police Weapons
刊名 月旦法學雜誌
出版單位 元照出版公司
期數 201805 (276期)
DOI 10.3966/102559312018050276002  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄