| 篇名 |
“需要國家干預說”與“縱橫統一說”經濟法學思想考辨——與劉文華教授商榷 |
| 並列篇名 |
Investigating and Analysing the Economic Law Thoughts of “Needed State Intervention Theory”and “Management-Coordination Theory”:Consulting with Professor Liu Wen-hua |
| 作者 |
劉輝 |
| 中文摘要 |
“需要國家干預說”與“縱橫統一說”一樣高度重視經濟民主，與中國經濟法的歷史是相容的。“需要國家干預說”不僅是“國家干預”之法，也是“干預國家”之法，與“縱橫統一說”一樣强調“市場之手”的運用。“需要國家干預說”主張經濟法具有謙抑性，是與三中全會精神相符的。橫向經濟關係與縱向經濟關係的劃分幷非涇渭分明，“縱橫統一說”的主要研究對象與“需要國家干預說”無實質性差异。“需要國家干預說”幷不會引發經濟法獨立性的缺失。“需要國家干預說”與“縱橫統一說”均强調經濟法調控受體的權利保障，構建體系化的權利保護機制是正確的法律進路。 |
| 英文摘要 |
Both “Needed State Intervention Theory”(NSIT)and “Management-Coordination Theory” (MCT)are highly valued the economic democracy, and compatible with the history of China’s economic law. NSIT emphasized that economic law is not only the law of “state intervention”, but also the law of “intervening the state”, also stress the use of “the hand of the market”. NSIT is in accordance with the spirit of the The Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee that the economic law abide by the principle of modesty. The relationship between lateral economic relationship and longitudinal economic relationship is not quite distinct from each other. The research objects of the two theories are essentially the same. NSIT does not lead to the lack of independence of the economic law. Both of the two theories emphasized the right protection of the receptor of the macro-regulation and market regulation by economic law, and the establishment of a system of right protection mechanism is the correct legal approach. |
| 起訖頁 |
151-166 |
| 關鍵詞 |
需要國家干預說、需要縱橫統一說、需要謙抑性原理、需要動態干預、需要經濟法獨立性、Needed State Intervention Theory、Management-Coordination Theory、the principle of modesty、dynamic intervention、independence of economic law |
| 刊名 |
厦门大学法律评论 |
| 出版單位 |
廈門大學法學院
|
| 期數 |
201906 (31期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/615471682019060031010 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
