| 英文摘要 |
It is the core of the reform of the People Jury System and the important part of judicial reform that people assessors just participate in the trial of facts, which eliminates the disadvantages of the people assessors in the field of law. In the system, judges hear the application of law by law. At the same time, the fact that jurors join only the trial of reality is more consistent with rule of thumb and enhances the social acceptability of judicial decisions, but also to, that is to enhance the public credibility of the judiciary. As a new reform, the court needs to explore in practice, both to determine the scope of the facts of the people jurors, but also to avoid “one size fits all”. The grassroots court the author working in, as a pilot court of the people jurors, explores actively and effectively relevant systems according to the geographical characteristics and trial reality. From the trial of facts and the trial of law of civil cases, the paper analyzes measures one by one the pilot court making in the practice and existing problems in the practical operation, combining the pilot practices and specific cases of the reform of the People Jury System. And this article, finally from the function orientation, system design and supporting measures, puts forward detailed suggestions on establishing the separation mechanism of the trial of facts and that of law in civil cases.
|
