| 英文摘要 |
If based on the definition of “paradigm” of T. Kuhn strictly, it is difficult to say that the approaches of “legal doctrine” and “social science of law” are two different paradigms in Chinas legal research at present. Because neither the study of “legal doctrine” nor the “social science of law” has enough representative research achievements, so whats the right thing to do is to continue to do further research. And if it is fall into the insignificance debate prematurely, which would cause negatively effect on the development of law research in China. In the aspect of research of “social science of law”, it is still necessary to broaden the vision and try to make contributions to the world academic field. In addition, we should also wake up some of the possible consequences of the study of “social science of law”.
|
