篇名 | 論“互聯網專條”--理解與適用 |
---|---|
並列篇名 | On Internet Tort Liability Clause - Understanding and Application |
作者 | 楊吉 |
中文摘要 | 評價“互聯網專條”的好壞是一回事,如何理解與適用又是另一回事,而本文的重點在後者。正如文章多次強調,互聯網專條作為一個原則性的條款、概括性的規定,在概念用語、程序配套、制度銜接等上面有這樣或那樣的問題,但它不失為我國對網路侵權立法的一個進步。它的規制效應不容質疑,它的引導作用不容小看,當然,它未來的完善空間同樣不容忽視。 |
英文摘要 | There are differences between making comments on Internet Tort Liability Clause and how to understand and apply This article focuses on the latter As I emphasize, Internet Tort Liability Clause is a principled and generalized clause, which has more or less problems in the use of concept, procedures and relative institutions Even so, I think the Internet Tort Liability Clause make positive contributions to CPR Internet legal system In a word, there no doubt about the effect of regulation and the function of guiding, just like we must not ignore that it still needs improvement. |
起訖頁 | 149-162 |
關鍵詞 | 侵權責任法、互聯網專條、避風港原則、紅旗標準、The Tort Law、Internet Tort Liability Clause、Internet Tort Safe Harbor Principles、Red Flag Standard |
刊名 | 厦门大学法律评论 |
出版單位 | 廈門大學法學院 |
期數 | 201411 (24期) |
DOI | 10.3966/615471682014110024009 複製DOI DOI申請 |
QRCode | |