月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
篇名
美國與臺灣生產事故補償制度比較
並列篇名
Comparison Birth-related Injury Compensation Acts between Taiwan and the United States
作者 楊智傑張家維
中文摘要 臺灣於2012年制定「鼓勵醫療機構辦理生育事故爭議事件試辦計畫」,並於2015年12月於立法院通過「生產事故救濟條例」。其針對生產事故糾紛提供直接補償,避免訴訟紛爭,以改善我國醫療品質。另外一方面亦提供病患於發生事故時得以獲得迅速救濟管道。本法案解決了長久以來醫病關係之對立與緊張,並減輕了病患與其家屬在事故之中所承受的壓力。本文研究重點,希望對比美國「維吉尼亞州新生兒神經損害補償法」及「佛羅里達州新生兒關於神經學損傷補償法」,與臺灣甫通過的「生產事故救濟條例」進行比較,以檢視法制之差異。
英文摘要 In 2012, Taiwan government implemented the experimental “No-fault Compensation for Birth-related Injury Program”, then the legislature passed “Remedy for Birth-related Injury Act” in December, 2015. The Act is aimed at avoiding litigation and improving quality in the medical treatment. On the other hand, this Act provide relief and subsidies immediately for patients when birth-related Injury happened. This act will solve the problem of tension and opposition in the doctor-patient relationship, and alleviate the pressure patients and their families suffered. U.S., Virginia and Florida were the first two states which enact birthrelated Neurological Injury Compensation Act. In Taiwan, the congress recently passed “Remedy for Birth-related Injury Compensation Act” in December 2015. This study will introduce Neurological Injury Compensation Acts in Virginia and Florida, and try to compare with Taiwan’ Act, finally point what the differences are.
起訖頁 127-161
關鍵詞 醫療糾紛新生兒生育事故無過失補償制度Medical MalpracticeNew-birthBirth-related InjuryNo-fault
刊名 治未指錄:健康政策與法律論叢
出版單位 中華國民健康政策與法律學會
期數 201601 (4期)
DOI 10.3966/2306739X2016010004006  複製DOI  DOI申請
QRCode
 



讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄