| 篇名 |
由美國經驗論台灣以仲裁制度處理醫療糾紛之挑戰與建議 |
| 並列篇名 |
The Challenges and Suggestions of Applying Arbitration to Treating Medical Malpractices in Taiwan-Experiences Sharing from the U.S. |
| 作者 |
張婷 |
| 中文摘要 |
本文目的在於借鏡美國以仲裁制度解決醫療糾紛之經驗，呼籲「醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法（草案）」中，除調解外，可多增加仲裁一途，供當事人選擇。仲裁制度相較於訴訟，仍具有對抗性特徵，但尚可發揮ADR優點。尤其面對具重要性、唯一性與不可逆性特徵之醫療糾紛，由當事人選擇之具備專業醫療或法律知識背景之仲裁人擔任真相釐清與法律責任確定之工作，對於生命或健康之流逝不失為提供另一扇解決問題之窗。 |
| 英文摘要 |
The aim of this article is to apply arbitration experiences from the U.S. regarding to dealing with medical malpractices. The “Medical Malpractice Resolution and Compensation Act (draft)” might be able to add arbitration to become another option except mediation. Comparing with litigation, arbitration not only has the same confrontational feature, but also has ADR advantages. Medical malpractices have characteristics like importance, uniqueness, and irreversibility. Chosen arbitrators, which are medical or legal experts, to carry fact clarification and legal duties responsibilities might provide a way to deal with lost lives or health. |
| 起訖頁 |
1-20 |
| 關鍵詞 |
仲裁、醫療糾紛、裁判外紛爭解決模式、「醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法 （草案）」、Arbitration、Medical Malpractice、Alternative Dispute Resolution、the “Medical Malpractice Resolution and Compensation Act (draft)” |
| 刊名 |
醫事法學 |
| 出版單位 |
中華民國醫事法律學會
|
| 期數 |
201512 (22:2期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/207976642015122202001 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
