| 英文摘要 |
Criminal confiscated new through Hou, judicial practice will more frequently to using criminal seized of means, to preservation future confiscated referee and Chase levy referee of implementation, dang criminal seized with forced implementation occurred competing timely, criminal method or forced implementation method does not rules program should how processing, paper concludes Japan of legislation cases and China both of judicial practice views, for criminal seized and forced implementation competing collection of various situation, in both criminal and forced implementation purpose of premise Xia, all analysis various different of competing collection program, Through this analysis, operation of hope to help our practice. |
