| 篇名 |
消保法第51條懲罰性賠償金計算基礎之損害額是否包含非財產上損害？ |
| 並列篇名 |
Should Punitive Damages Be Calculated into Non-pecuniary Damages? |
| 作者 |
陳宗佑 |
| 中文摘要 |
消保法第51 條懲罰性賠償金之「損害額」，是否包括「非財產上損害賠償」？最高法院實務見解採否定說，學說有採肯定說，亦有採否定說。本文認為在現行法解釋論上採否定說為宜，但立法者若在消保法或是民法明文規定採肯定說，使懲罰性賠償金之「損害額」包括「非財產上損害賠償」，似乎亦無不可，惟此立法是否有違反憲法之比例原則或一行為不二罰（一事不二罰）原則？值得深思。 |
| 英文摘要 |
According to Article 51 of Consumer Protection Act, the consumers may claim for a punitive damage up to 5 times the amount of actual damages as a result of injuries caused by the willful misconduct of traders. The calculation basis on the amount of damages of punitive damages should be excluded from the non-pecuniary damages to avoid double jeopardy, finally, nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb. |
| 起訖頁 |
90-100 |
| 關鍵詞 |
非財產上損害、懲罰性賠償金、損失填補原則、不當得利禁止原則、一行為不二罰原則、Consumer Protection Act、Punitive Damage、Compensatory Damages |
| 刊名 |
裁判時報 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
201704 (58期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/207798362017040058008 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
