篇名 | 受僱醫師過勞職業災害之救濟 |
---|---|
作者 | 朱美璘 |
中文摘要 | 受僱醫師在執行職務過程時本身突發疾病,是否係因工時過長導致過勞之職業災害?若確係因工作過勞所致職業災害,依目前受僱醫師尚未納入勞動基準法規範,又有何民事救濟方式?本文僅以蔡○羌醫師訴請奇美醫院請求職業災害損害賠償之訴訟事件為例,探究工時認定及其制度、過勞定義、受僱醫師與醫院間之法律關係及受僱醫師因職業災害而為請求時之民事請求權基準,而2016年6月衛福部公布將於2020年前將受僱醫師納入勞基法規範行業之政策,則將受僱醫師納入勞基法規範行業,是否即對受僱醫師提供更為完整之保障,而得解決目前受僱醫師因工時過長、過勞致促發突發性疾病之問題。 |
英文摘要 | How to judge if the accidental illness is due to long-term occupational overwork or not when an employed doctor’s illness symptoms outbreak during his duty performance? If that is the case, how shall the employed doctor seek to civil relief since an employed doctor is not a protected individual under Labor Stander Law? In the case of the litigation raised by Dr. Tsai, who was once employed by Chi Mei Medical Center, this article aims to discuss the definition of overwork, the legal contract between an employed doctor and a medical center, and the benchmark of civil claims when occupational hazards are related to overwork. In June 2016, the Ministry of Health and Welfare announced that, before year 2020, all the employed doctors will be under the protection of Labor Stander Law. Then, it will take times to observe if the protection will reduce the accidental illness caused by overworking and will it provides de jure protection for an employed doctor. |
起訖頁 | 79-98 |
關鍵詞 | 受僱醫師、過勞、工時、侵權行為、職業災害、勞基法、Employed Doctor、Overwork、Working Hours、Torts |
刊名 | 裁判時報 |
出版單位 | 元照出版公司 |
期數 | 201611 (53期) |
DOI | 10.3966/207798362016110053007 複製DOI DOI申請 |
QRCode | |