| 英文摘要 |
After Ko Wen-Je winning the Taipei City mayor election on Nov. 24, 2014, the security report of the Taipei City Dome Project was soon made by Taipei City government, indicating several faulty designs of the project. In fact, after Environmental Impact Assessment Review Committee conditionally approved the project on May 26, 2011, nearby residents filed a lawsuit against related administrative disciplinary action, and the Taipei High Administrative Court and the Supreme Administrative Court rendered their judgements respectively. This article is the study on the judgements, focus on the theory of protective norms, and Environmental Impact Assessment Act Article 3, section 2, which is written “ When the industry competent authority is the developer, industry competent authority members shall withdraw from the voting process.” In the end, the author will offer several thoughts about the disputes.
|
