| 英文摘要 |
What do the disputants need in the family disputes? How the family court that is constructed by the newly passed Family Proceedings Act can do for the disputants? What is the core function of the family court? The author will propose a perspective of “quasi-counseling model of family court” to illustrate the dynamics of family dispute resolution. Providing the two stories of law, the author aims to discusses the following questions: 1. How the quasi-counseling model can be one of the interpretations of family court? 2. How can the interpretation of quasi-counseling family court apply to the distinguish character of family dispute? 3. What is the limitation of the family court? What is the law “can do” and “can not do”? How to contribute to the future modification of family law, family proceedings act, and civil procedure law by using the “quasi counseling model” as the interpretation? 4. How does the quasi-counseling model challenge the jurisprudence of family law as well as civil procedure law? For giving the comprehension of these issues, the paper will be organized into several parts. First of all, the author will explain the meaning quasi- counseling model of family and link her empirical study of family dispute mediation to this interpretation. Secondly, the author will illustrate two stories of law to discuss the needs and the character of family disputants. Thirdly, the author will discuss how the paradigm and idea changes brought into the jurisprudence of civil procedure law by family disputes. In the end, the author will propose two routes of family court for solving the family disputes as the conclusion. |
