| 篇名 |
民辦都更之私程序法與司法審查──以最高行政法院102年度判字第765號判決為例之評析 |
| 並列篇名 |
Private Due Process of Law for Private Participation in Urban Renewal and Its Judicial Review: Comments to the 102 Nien Du No. 765 Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court |
| 作者 |
許登科 |
| 中文摘要 |
依都市更新條例，得由私人申請都市更新之開始和計畫提出，再由行政機關核准或核定。此民辦都更之特殊行政方式，乃都更公共任務之程序民營化，依釋字第709號，係屬合憲，但民辦都更中私人執行都更程序，應受國家公權力監督，乃憲法上正當行政程序的要求。且經本文探討，民辦都更之正當行政程序，應包括私人執行都更應有之正當程序，為此本文認為應於行政法總論與各論整合地配套建構出整體之私程序法制。此外，民辦都更也有特殊司法審查面向，本文並提出對話溝通模式之審查方式，以補充法院依判斷餘地理論之審查事項，俾實質確保民辦都更正當程序中相關私人參與的法制地位與權益。 |
| 英文摘要 |
In accordance with Urban Renewal Act, the private sector can apply with the authority for approval of the initiation and the drafted plan of urban renewal. The urban renewal process participated by the private (i.e., private-participated urban renewal) is a procedural privatization of urban renewal and but it should be supervised by the state’s power. It should especially adhere to the requirement of constitutional due process in administrative procedures. The article asserts that Private Due Process of Law should be constructed and be integrated into general and special administrative law. Otherwise, while private-participated urban renewal has been seen as the implement of private due process law, a special judicial reviewing obligation is required. In judicial reviewing, courts have to review the administrative decisions to insure the private participation in ur- ban renewal development, this article submit the “communicating-mode” reviewing method, which can improve the lake of methods for courts to review the administrative decisions. |
| 起訖頁 |
1-82 |
| 關鍵詞 |
正當行政程序、私程序、民營化、司法審查、都更、Due Process of Law、Private Due Process、Privatization |
| 刊名 |
世新法學 |
| 出版單位 |
世新大學法學院
|
| 期數 |
201512 (9:1期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/199815542015120901001 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
