| 英文摘要 |
The technological revolution of intelligent manufacturing represented by artificial intelligence is an important symbol of Fourth Revolution. With the development of new theories and new technologies such as cellular network, big data and neuroscience, artificial intelligence are developing from silicon chip to biochip. As a result, more and more “brain-like” artificial intelligence emergence which makes a huge progress on their autonomy and creativity. While artificial intelligence are changing our life, they also bring many legal issues and challenges to our law system. Among the issues, whether an artificial intelligence could be legally defined as principal is the core of the debate and the premise of relevant legal issues. If the artificial intelligent could not be defined as principal, who will be responsible for any personal or property damage cause by artificial intelligence and what kind of responsibility it should be. At present, neither the human action centered of tort liability theory nor can the pro-ducer centered of Product liability theory answer this question. This paper analyzes the different viewpoints of artificial intelligence as legal subjects and compares the artificial intelligence legal status in the United States, Germany and the European Union. On this basis, it proposed four prin ciples for Taiwan’s legislation about artificial intelligence. The solution, especially based on the degree of independence of the will of artificial in-telligence, is worthy of attention.
|
