| 篇名 |
標準必要專利之戰爭——禁制令行不行？ |
| 並列篇名 |
The Wars of the Standard Essential Patents — Injunction or No Injunction Is a Question |
| 作者 |
黃惠敏 |
| 中文摘要 |
禁制令是否能核發，影響標準必要專利權人與潛在被授權人對於權利金之談判能力。然而， 標準必要專利權人為F/RAND授權之承諾，是否限制專利權人行使排除、防止侵害專利之權利（如提起禁制令），非屬無疑，亦成為全球關注之焦點。本文嘗試從比較法之觀點探究美國、德國及日本相關案例對本議題處理之方式。本文認為解決本問題之關鍵在於如何能在「潛在被授權人使用標準必要專利之需求」與「確保標準必要專利權人可以適當地就其發明得到補償」間取得平衡，尤其是如何引導雙方積極談判權利金，減少雙方投機取巧之機會，相關立法例如何達到此一目的為本文探討核心。 |
| 英文摘要 |
Whether the injunction is granted influences the bargaining power of standard essential patent owner and the potential licensee. However, it is doubtable whether the standard essential patent (SEP) holders’ FRAND (Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) license commitments limits SEP holders’ rights to exclude or prevent from the patent infringement (e.g. to file the application for the injunction) and it has become the focus of the global attention. This Article firstly researches on the relevant cases happening in the United States, German, and Japan to analyze the methods taken to solve this issue from the view of the comparative laws. Further this Article explores how to balance the need of the potential licensees to use the standard essential patents and the appropriate compensation of the invention rewarded to the standard essential patent owner. |
| 起訖頁 |
157-180 |
| 關鍵詞 |
標準設定組織、標準必要專利、公平合理無歧視、Standard-setting Organizations |
| 刊名 |
月旦財經法雜誌 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
201611 (39期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/1815008X2016110039007 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
