| 篇名 |
商品之通常使用、可期待之合理使用及被害人與有過失之判斷 |
| 並列篇名 |
The Determination of the Ordinary and the Expectably Reasonable Use of Products and the Victim’s Contributory Negligence |
| 作者 |
郭麗珍 |
| 中文摘要 |
臺灣消費者保護法「商品責任」與民法「商品製造人責任」，處於競合關係，呈現「雙軌制的規範體系」。民法第191條之1第1項構成要件「商品製造人因其商品之通常使用或消費所致他人之損害」，負賠償責任。在實務上，被害人是否為通常之使用或消費，因舉證責任之分配上，被害人須就其損害之發生係因該商品之「通常使用」所致，應先負舉證責任，而成為製造人是否負賠償責任之首要爭點。又依據消費者保護法施行細則第5條規定，商品可期待之合理使用為商品是否欠缺安全性之立法明定判斷因素之一。本文擬探討消費者保護法「商品可期待之合理使用」、民法第191條之1「因其商品之通常使用或消費」與被害人與有過失間之適用關係。
|
| 英文摘要 |
There is a concurrent relationship between the “product liability” law under Taiwan’s Consumer Protection Act and the “product manufacturer’s liability” law under the Civil Code. There two in turn form the “dual-track regulatory system”. The element of product manufacturer’s liability under Article 191-1, Paragraph 1, is that “the product manufacturer is liable for the damage caused by the ordinary use or consumption of products”. In practice, owing to the allocation of the burden of proof, the victim bears the burden of proving her damage is caused by the “ordinary use” of products. Therefore, the primary issue of product manufacturer’s liability lies on whether the victim is harmed due to her ordinary use or consumption of products. In addition, pursuant to Article 5 of the Enforcement Rules of the Consumer Protection Act, the expectably reasonable use of products is one of the statutorily delineated determining factors of whether the products lack safety. This Article plans to discuss the correlations in applications among the “expectably reasonable use of products” under the Consumer Protection Act, the “causation of the ordinary use or consumption of products” and the victim’s contributory negligence. |
| 起訖頁 |
23-35 |
| 關鍵詞 |
商品之通常使用或消費、可期待之合理使用、使用者之自我責任、與有過失、Ordinary Use or Consumption of Products、Expectably Reasonable Use of Products、Self-responsibility of Users、Contributory Negligence |
| 刊名 |
月旦民商法雜誌 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
201609 (53期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/172717622016090053002 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
