| 英文摘要 |
For the reason that the important evaluation point of the concurrentassumed debt lies in that the new debtor has direct interests in the debt repayment, in law or economy, he tends to join in the debt. Although the concurrent assumed debt also has guarantee function, which is an objectiveresult of the fact that joint and several liability is a certain consequence of the concurrent assumed debt, and it is not its important evaluation point. Through analysis, we found that the concurrent assumed debt is quite different from guarantee. Therefore, the regulation of guarantee in the Article 23 of the Guarantee Law and the Article 29 of the Interpretation of the Guarantee Law cannot be applied in concurrent assumed debt. If the original debtor transfers his debt to others, he can claim only relative effect occurs, for interests of the new debtor, though his agreement is unnecessary.
|
