| 英文摘要 |
This paper cited the principle of prohibiting improper connection , the principle of equality and the principle of proportionality to test the legality of student achievement assessment supplementary regulations about makeup exam of periodic assessment in some counties by means of dogmatic. Besides, this paper tried to investigate the appropriateness of completely discretionary accounting about university students’ achievement assessment, while university teachers wouldn’t follow general principle of assessment, in an example as Yi Zi No. 1533 criminal case on March 31, 2006 in Taipei District Court. Student achievement assessment supplementary regulations in some counties don’t treat rationally students’ learning assessment, transforming from ‘deserved scores’ to ‘identified scores’. This irrational identification about students’ scores of makeup exam would depart from principle of assessment and also violate adminiatrative law & principles. From university to elementary school, student achievement assessment affairs should adopt and fit general assessment principle together. Based on university autonomy , university teachers approved willfully student’ s score, not bound by logic and rules of thumb. These aren’t appropriate. Finally , according to the research results, the paper tried to propose some suggests . |
