篇名 | International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters–the European Path as a Model? |
---|---|
並列篇名 | 刑事課題之國際司法合作──以歐洲之路為模板? |
作者 | Helmut Satzger |
中文摘要 | 在全球化和數位化的浪潮下,刑事訴訟面臨著全新的挑戰。為了克服國與國之間的差異,我們必須找到與法治兼容的解決方案。歐盟在刑事司法互助中以「相互承認」為基礎原則,透過此原則,歐盟已經落實許多重要法案。 本文特別聚焦在歐洲之逮捕令狀及調查令狀,在「數位證據」方面,已規劃之歐洲生產和保護令。作者不僅描述這些創新的基本內容與優勢,同時指出了相呼應的問題。 本文認為,對於尋求通過法律援助相互支持的非歐盟成員國來說,相互承認原則不可否認的具有一定之潛力;然而,相互承認原則必須受到限制,特別是在嚴重侵犯基本權利的情況下。 |
英文摘要 | Criminal prosecution is faced with completely new challenges in the age of globalisation and digitisation. To overcome national borders, new solutions must be found that are nonetheless compatible with the rule of law. The European Union has based its judicial cooperation in criminal law on the principle of ‘mutual recognition’. It has already adopted numerous important legal acts implementing this principle. The article focuses in particular on the European Arrest Warrant, the European Investigation Order and, in the area of ‘e-evidence’, the planned European Production and Preservation Order. The author not only describes the essential contents and advantages of these innovations, but also points out the problems arising from them. As a result, he believes that the principle of mutual recognition has an undeniable potential for improving judicial cooperation in criminal matters also for non-EU Member States seeking to support each other by providing legal assistance. Nevertheless, mutual recognition must be limited - in particular by inserting an ordre public-proviso for cases of serious fundamental rights violations. |
起訖頁 | 76-90 |
關鍵詞 | 歐洲聯盟、相互承認、司法合作、歐洲逮捕令、歐洲調查令、電子證據基本權利、European Union、Mutual Recognition、Judicial cooperation、European Arrest Warrant、European Investigation Order、E-evidence、Fundamental Rights |
刊名 | 月旦法學雜誌 |
出版單位 | 元照出版公司 |
期數 | 202005 (300期) |
DOI | 10.3966/102559312020050300004 複製DOI DOI申請 |
QRCode | |