篇名 | 刑法第190條之1的不法規責與構成要件解釋 |
---|---|
並列篇名 | Attribution of Wrong and Interpretation of the Elements in Section §190-1 of the Criminal Code |
作者 | 古承宗 |
中文摘要 | 2018年修法時,立法者刪除了刑法第190條之1的「致生公共危險」要件,使本罪轉為抽象危險犯。抽象危險犯屬於結果犯的下位類型,不法構成要件設定仍以結果要素為必要,亦即「污染」。不同於實害犯的實害結果,此種結果要素是指「以創成危險的特殊事件」(或稱中間結果),尤其是對外呈現出「法益侵害的危險徵象」。污染結果既是對外呈現出法益侵害的危險,而且亦須可歸責於污染手段的行為不法。因此,具有複合性與系統特殊性的環境媒介(水體、土壤、空氣)受有污染時,組成內容即有必要對外表現出可得感知的變化,又考慮到本罪在於保護生態與人本的雙重法益,那麼污染行為在解釋上則須是針對環境媒介之生態性運作的攻擊。 |
英文摘要 | After the reform of criminal law in 2018, the feature of section § 190-1 of the Criminal Code “Danger to the public to causal” was deleted. Then the section § 190-1 of the Criminal Code caused by the will of the legislator as an abstract threat offense. Basically, the abstract endangerment offense is a manifestation of the success of the offense and the sanction is still a success realization required. In contrast to the infringement offense, the success mentioned here is to be understood as a danger-based event. Thus, the danger of infringement of rights is externally perceptible. Furthermore, this success must be attributed to the behavior wrong. As a result, the violation of the complex and system-typical environmental medium on the one hand be a visible change, and on the other hand, such a change mean nothing other than the prevention of ecological function of each environmental medium, because § 190-1 Criminal Code protects the organic - anthropocentric legal interest. |
起訖頁 | 42-68 |
關鍵詞 | 環境刑法、規範理論、污染、抽象危險犯、行政從屬性、Environmental Criminal Act、Norm Theory、Pollution、Abstract Danger Offense、Accessoriness of the Administration |
刊名 | 月旦法學雜誌 |
出版單位 | 元照出版公司 |
期數 | 201907 (290期) |
DOI | 10.3966/102559312019070290003 複製DOI DOI申請 |
QRCode | |