| 篇名 |
人民參審上訴制度之比較研究──以日本法制檢討為中心 |
| 並列篇名 |
A Comparative Study on Lay Participation's Appeal System: Focusing on the Review of Japan's Legal System |
| 作者 |
林裕順 |
| 中文摘要 |
總統府召開「司法改革國是會議」，謂以「人民的司法」為思考主軸，「廣納民意的改革程序」以及「與時俱進的司法制度」為兩大核心理念。同時，有關人民參審制度推動，規劃配套「起訴狀一本主義」、強化「堅實第一審」以及架構「金字塔型」審級制度。然而，綜觀政府推動刑事訴訟法之條文增修，變動上訴救濟並未相應調整第一審以落實直接審理、言詞審理，導致「審級結構」未能植基「堅實第一審」，「金字塔」仿如空中樓閣、海市蜃樓。日本司改「人民參審」、「堅實第一審」以及「金字塔型」審級構造，政策論理彼此連動、相互輝映「三位一體」。本文參考日本相關論據說理、法令規範與實務運作，用作我國司法改革之比較法制參考。 |
| 英文摘要 |
The “National Conference on Judicial Reform” convened by the Office of the President was based on the thinking of “people’s justice” and complemented with “innovative procedures gathering public opinions”and “judicial system keeping up with the times” as its two main concepts. In the meantime, the “indictment-only doctrine”, implementation of “strengthened first instance” and the establishment of “pyramided trial hierarchy” would be supplemented to facilitate lay participation system. However, given government’s proposed amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure, the appeal system in Taiwan has not epitomized direct and verbal trials in the first instance, resulting in the failure to establish the pyramided trial hierarchy therein. On the other hand, the “lay participation”, “strengthened first instance” and “pyramided” trial hierarchy have been interconnected closely under Japan’s judicial reform. This article referred to Japan’s relevant theories, legislations and practice and could serve as a comparative legal study reference for our judicial reform. |
| 起訖頁 |
24-41 |
| 關鍵詞 |
司法改革、人民參審、上訴制度、事後審、法律審、Judicial Reform、Lay Participation、Appeal System、Post review、Trial of Law |
| 刊名 |
月旦法學雜誌 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
201811 (282期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/102559312018110282002 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
