| 英文摘要 |
The objective wrongfulness of the “Accumulative Concrete Offense” in §190-1 of the Criminal Code shall be considered of its imputable association among elements of a crime, damages of a result and danger of an offense. This article finds that, defining the type of recidivists may not resolve issues of accumulative offenses, in contrast to, it creates a penalty prerequisite problem. Furthermore, adopting the imputation of the general damages of a result is as if abandoning the principle of self-responsibility and resource ban; consequently, the original predominant imputation may be impoliticly turned to purely oppressing thoughts of endangerment. |
