| 篇名 |
員警槍擊拒捕通緝犯的正當防衛爭議──評最高法院105年度台非字第88號刑事判決與其歷審裁判 |
| 並列篇名 |
Self Defense Concerning Deadly Weapon Use of Police: A Case Study of the 2016 Supreme Court Criminal Decision Taifei Zi No. 88 |
| 作者 |
許恒達 |
| 中文摘要 |
本文以一則最高法院廣受注意的實務判決為中心，討論警察開槍阻止拒捕通緝犯逃亡時，不小心致令其死亡的案例，其中關涉的議題包括「警察執法行為時可否主張正當防衛？」、「侵害行為有無應該事前或事後判定？」與「誤想防衛的法律效果為何？如何判斷是否成立過失犯？」，筆者認為這些問題都關涉我國正當防衛解釋適用問題的核心，可以透過本案判決的評釋而得到較具合理的答案。 |
| 英文摘要 |
This article focuses on a high-profile judgment of the Supreme Court and discusses a scenario in which the fugitive was shot to death by police when resisting arrest. Issues involved therein include “whether the police can assert self-defense during law enforcement”, “should the injurious act be determined in advance or afterwards,” and “what’s the legal consequence of putative self-defense? How to determine the constitution of a negligent crime?” The author opines that all of the above questions concern the core problems of how to apply and interpret “self-defense” and can be reasonably answered in light of the foregoing judgement. |
| 起訖頁 |
22-42 |
| 關鍵詞 |
正當防衛、誤想防衛、防衛情狀、依法令之行為、警械使用條例、Self Defense、Putative Defense、Apparent Threat of Unlawful and Immediate Violence、Conduct Performed in Accordance With Law、Act Governing the Use of Police Weapons |
| 刊名 |
月旦法學雜誌 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
201805 (276期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/102559312018050276002 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
