| 英文摘要 |
Compared to the current provisions of Taiwan law, the amended provisions of the Japanese civil law and consumer contract lawas a whole (e.g. the ability of expression legal will, legal profiteering acts as specific types of public order and good moral, the exception of the motive error evaluated as an important matter in the transaction as an error in the content of the meaning, and due to the absence of a specific negligence to conceal the meaning of the expression, or the regulation of the improper clause of the stereotyped contract etc.) can find its correspondent provisions in Taiwan civil law. But the amendment to the Japanese law appears to be more aware of the close interaction between civil law and consumer contract law, which provides a noteworthy view for Taiwan’s consumer protection research. |
