| 篇名 |
出賣人擔保責任與債務不履行之關係 |
| 並列篇名 |
The Relationship of Seller’s Warranty and Non-performance |
| 作者 |
陳聰富 |
| 中文摘要 |
我國民法於債編通則規定債務不履行責任，又於債編分則規定出賣人的瑕疵擔保責任，因此產生一項爭議，即民法除債務不履行責任外，瑕疵擔保責任是否有存在的必要？本文認為在判斷時點上，出賣人負債務不履行責任以履行時為準，對於買受人較為有利。在法律效果上，債務不履行責任又較物之瑕疵擔保責任，對於買受人更為有利。且在歸責事由判斷上，債務不履行責任與瑕疵擔保責任，並無實質上不同，則就買受人而言，應以主張出賣人負債務不履行責任，即可保障其權益。 |
| 英文摘要 |
The liability of non-performance and that of defect warranty are both provided in the Taiwan Civil Code, which raises an issue as to whether it is necessary to keep the rules governing the defect warranty in addition to those governing non-performance. This paper indicates that the buyer gets more interests in claiming his rights as receiving defective goods when the rules of non-performance are applied, either because of the timing determining the non-performance or the potential rights offered to the buyer to claim. In effect, the seller is held liable for his defective goods without fault either under the rules of defective warranty or those of non-performance. |
| 起訖頁 |
17-26 |
| 關鍵詞 |
物之瑕疵擔保責任、權利瑕疵擔保責任、債務不履行責任、不完全給付、Warranty for Defects of Goods |
| 刊名 |
月旦法學雜誌 |
| 出版單位 |
元照出版公司
|
| 期數 |
201702 (261期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/102559312017020261002 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
