| 英文摘要 |
The incumbent Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act merely consists of 35 articles. With this simple proceeding, this Act is difficult to be put into judicial practice. Therefore, the Judicial Yuan has been actively promoting the legalization of interpretation system, which changes the interpretation method from meeting to court proceedings. The delicately-designed draft amendment is comprised of 109 articles. However, the interpretation right of grand justices is different in essence with the jurisdiction right of courts. In courts, the jurisdiction right shall be conducted by judgment proceedings, which is composed of plaintiffs and defendants. On the contrary, there only exists a petitioner in constitutional interpretation proceedings except the impeachment of the president or the vice president and the dissolution of unconstitutional political parties. The court cannot conduct oral arguments between two opposite parties under this circumstance. This article articulates the inconvenience of legalization of the interpretation system and thus prevent possible impracticability. |
