| 篇名 |
教練的領導威權、體罰、管教與責備：零體罰的思考 |
| 並列篇名 |
Authoritarian, corporal punishment, discipline, and blame in coaching leadership: No more corporal punishment |
| 作者 |
高三福、李伯倫、謝明輝 |
| 中文摘要 |
教育部已明文規定各級學校的身體活動與體能培訓不得以處罰或體罰為目的，但有關體育教師或教練的體罰新聞時有所聞。教練如何與時俱進，在現今的零體罰政策下正確教學發揮教育功能，是一值得探究的議題。本文從探討領導威權的意涵，探討支持與反對體罰的論點來釐清體罰的訓練效果，並提出管教與責備的建議。希望藉由以上的探討與澄清，啟發教練工作者在訓練與帶隊管理上的思考，提昇教練的訓練與指導技巧。 |
| 英文摘要 |
The Ministry of Education announced the law that forbids using physical activity as punishment and corporal punishment in school in Taiwan. However, the news about corporal punishment in PE teachers and coaches showed up from time to time. The issue for no corporal punishment in sport was necessary for coaches to improve their teaching/instruction skills. First, we explored the meaning of authoritarian in coach. Second, we revealed the support-arguments and counter-arguments for corporal punishment to learn the pros and cons. Finally, we suggested to coaches how to discipline athletes at the current time, especially under the human right values. We hope this paper can hint coaches in their training and instruction skills in a more scientific track. |
| 起訖頁 |
229-236 |
| 關鍵詞 |
訓練與指導、體育教育、教練選手關係、親師關係、training and instruction、physical education、coach-athlete relationship、student-athlete relationship |
| 刊名 |
中華體育季刊 |
| 出版單位 |
中華民國體育學會
|
| 期數 |
201609 (30:3期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/102473002016093003009 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
