| 篇名 |
專利法中「發明所屬技術領域中具有通常知識者」之法實證研究 |
| 並列篇名 |
A Legal Empirical Study of the PHOSITA in the Patent Law |
| 作者 |
宋皇志 |
| 中文摘要 |
發明所屬技術領域中具有通常知識者」（下稱「通常知識者」）是專利法制中相當重要之概念，然我國法院判決中從未具體認定「通常知識者」之能力或學經歷標準，亦未曾說明審判中係如何虛擬成「通常知識者」以進行進步性之判斷，引發進步性是否淪為法官或技術審查官之主觀判斷的疑慮。本文之法實證研究區分成量化研究與質性研究二部分，結論與建議包含：研究前預設之命題全部成立：大部分「專利審理者」於審理進步性時未決定「通常知識者」之技術水準，亦未虛擬之，而是以自身為標準；專利進步性審查之建議：建構出「專利審理者」決定並將自己虛擬成「通常知識者」之標準流程；修法建議：將專利法中「通常知識者」修改成「專利所屬技術領域中具有通常技能者」；對於智慧財產局之建議：專利審查官之選任宜儘量選擇具有產業經驗者；以及對於智慧財產法院之建議：技術審查官之數量必須再增加，且最好有產業經驗。 |
| 英文摘要 |
The PHOSITA (person having ordinary skill in the art) is an important concept in the current Patent Law. For example, PHOSITA is the objective standard for determining patent non-obviousness. Theoretically, when the patent examiners or judges (hereinafter “the Decision Makers”) examine the non-obviousness of a patent, they need to determine the technology level of the PHOSITA first. However, a review of our courts’ decisions shows that our courts have never identified the PHOSITA’s skill/experience level. Nor have they explained how to judge the non-obviousness in the perspective of the PHOSITA during the course of the decision-making. Consequently, it raises the question of whether the Decision Makers determine the patent nonobviousness subjectively. |
| 起訖頁 |
53-125 |
| 關鍵詞 |
專利、進步性、通常知識者、客觀標準、虛擬的人、實證研究、Patent、PHOSITA、Objective Standard、Hypothetical Person |
| 刊名 |
政大法學評論 |
| 出版單位 |
國立政治大學法律學系
|
| 期數 |
201609 (146期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/102398202016090146002 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
