| 英文摘要 |
Sexual industry regulation is a difficult problem for all countries. Our country, in the past, prostitutes and clients were both punished according to Article 80 of the old Social Order Maintenance Act. It was declared unconstitutional due to violation of the principle of equality by J.Y. Interpretation No. 666. There is a provision in the newly amended Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Art, which brings no punishment in a designated area. However, in view of reality (political or economic), there are no local governments setting up the designated area. This kind of nominal control does not guarantee protection towards the disadvantaged sex workers, but even causes more infringing. It is necessary for immediate changes in the existing law. This study observes and sums up the foreign legal systems, which have three categories: “prohibitionism”, “neo-regulatorism” and “abolitionism”. More and more countries adopt the Nordic model, which punishes clients but not prostitutes, because it strikes a balance between the protection of sex workers and the repression of the sexual industry’s development. This study suggests that regulative policies in our country should first establish the attitude towards the sex industry, and then adopt a gradual approach to achieve the dual objectives for both the protection of sex workers and the external costs of dealing with the sexual industry. |
