| 篇名 |
海峽兩岸違憲審查制度之比較與展望──兼談司法院大法官審理案件法上人民聲請釋憲制度之改進問題 |
| 並列篇名 |
A Comparative and Prospective Study of Judicial Review System in Chinese Mainland and Taiwan: Including a Discussion Regarding the Ways to Improve Direct Access to Constitutional Court in Taiwan’s Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act |
| 作者 |
牟憲魁 |
| 中文摘要 |
不論是在大陸還是在臺灣，完善違憲審查制度都是一個重要的課題。在大陸，全國人民代表大會常務委員會的憲法解釋權一直處於休眠狀態，因而出現了制定憲法解釋程序法的提議。而在臺灣，90年代末期圍繞是否導入美國式的司法審查制度曾有過熱烈的討論，其後，司法院以憲法解釋程序的裁判化為目標，提出了多個版本的司法院大法官審理案件法修正草案。關於如何改進司法院大法官審理案件法上的人民聲請釋憲制度，本文結合司法院改革問題對德國的裁判訴願和韓國的規範審查型訴願這兩種可能的選項進行了利弊分析，並提出了德國式裁判訴願和韓國式規範審查型訴願之外的第三條道路。 |
| 英文摘要 |
The development of judicial review is an important theme both in Chinese Mainland and Taiwan. In Chinese Mainland,the Standing Commitee of the National People’s Congress had never exercised its constitutional review power so that some scholars suggested to enact a Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act as soon as possible. In Taiwan, There had been a hot discussion about whether to import Maburystyle judicial review at the end of 1990s. After that, the Judicial Yuan drafted several versions of new Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act which aims to transfer constitutional interpretation procedure to constitutional judging procedure. With respect to the ways to improve direct access to constitutional court in Taiwan’s Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act, this paper analysed advantages and disadvantages of German and Korean individual constitutional complaint in perspective of the reform of Judicial Yuan, and suggested another way to improve direct access to constitutional cout at Taiwan. |
| 起訖頁 |
21-56 |
| 關鍵詞 |
違憲審查、憲法解釋、憲法訴願、司法院大法官審理案件法、Judicial Review、Constitutional Interpretation、ndividual Constitutional Complaint、Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act、Direct Access to Constitutional Court |
| 刊名 |
憲政時代 |
| 出版單位 |
中華民國憲法學會
|
| 期數 |
201607 (42:1期) |
| DOI |
10.3966/101665132016074201002 複製DOI DOI申請 |
| QRCode |
 |
| |
