| 英文摘要 |
Judical Yuan had proposed an amendment of Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act respectively in 2005, 2008 and 2013. In order to enhance the effectiveness when the constitutional court adjudicating cases, “general constitutional significance” had become a reason as the case would not be accepted; especially in amendment of 2013, which had clearly point out in legislative grounds, this mechanism was reference to Writ of Cetiorari of the US. But the meaning of “general constitutional significance” did not only in legislative grounds been clearly interpret, also on the practical application of the constitutional court was not unanimous. This article will firstly clarify how the constitutional court operates this concept, and search it’s meaning through related procedure acts. Second, discuss the Annahmeverfahren of Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and Writ of Cetiorari of US Supreme Court; and review the practical application of the constitutional court. Third, will analysis the amendment of Constitutional Interpretation Procedure Act in recent years, and the conclusion at last. |
