| 英文摘要 |
This research aims to look for items that should be significantly improved and determine the strategies priority of promoting the senior examination of professional interior design engineers. Among 19 SWOT factors associated with the promoting the senior examination of professional interior design engineers, there are 17 SWOT factors reaching consensus by fuzzy Delphi method. The weightings and scores of SWOT factors will be investigated through expert questionnaires and analyzed by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The improvement should be focused on 5 SWOT factors with higher weightings and lower scores as follows: Unclear domestic professional orientation, Uneven quality of decorators and interior designers, Exclusion effect of existing interior design business of architect, Low legal hierarchy of Regulations of Interior Decoration, and Lack of overall planning and complete system. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Fuzzy TOPSIS are used to preference ranking of 7 strategies of promoting the senior examination of professional interior design engineers. The first strategy is to build up an appropriate law to distinguish division of professional work of interior design, architecture, and civil engineering in order to lower exclusion effect; the second strategy is to raise legal hierarchy of Regulations of Interior Decoration in order to protect the rights of proprietors and practitioners. |
