| 英文摘要 |
In recent years, events of cultural heritage suffering from destruction and threats continues to be reported, whether they are caused by human or natural factors, the aftermath has prompted the conservation management of cultural heritage to become one of the crucial cultural policy to be strengthened in the government sector. Since the establishment of the “Regulations for Maintenance Plan of Monument” in 2005 in Taiwan, the government has begun to require all monument management units to propose a maintenance and management plan of the authority for future reference. However, Taiwan’s maintenance plan of monument does not seem to be achieving the expected benefits and effects throughout the planning, execution, assessment and amendment process of a conservation management project.
Therefore, this research implements a multinational comparative approach, of which includes the assembling of an extensive collection of conservation management plans for cultural heritage in text as well as their operation plans. From the basis of theoretical framework of Conservation Management Plan for Cultural Heritage, this research aims to discover the differences in the formulation of regulation between Taiwan, Australia and the U.K. The Key findings are that interpretation of value in cultural heritage and discourse in cultural significance are the primary elements in plan making; however, the execution process and assessment mechanism is the most critical aspect in the success of a conservation management plan. As there are very few discussions specifically focused on the structure of conservation management plans in Taiwan, the result of this research could act as a reference for future cultural heritage conservation management work of Taiwan. |
