月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
醫療品質雜誌 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
臺灣醫預法與國外醫糾處理及通報制度之比較
並列篇名
A study on Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act in Taiwan comparison with Foreign Laws -Focused on Mandatory Reporting
作者 洪聖惠 (Sheng-Hui Hung)謝亨如
中文摘要

目的:過去十多年以來,臺灣以鼓勵自願性通報(Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting system , TPR)作為提升病安文化的方式,在「醫療事故預防及爭議處理法」實施後,未來凡符合「重大醫療事故」定義者皆需進行法定通報,本文整理比較各國通報制度,作為臺灣實施之參考。結果:比較臺灣與各國之異同:臺灣病安通報發展模式與英國相近,先由自願性通報開始,發展至法定通報;澳洲由各地方政府自訂法定通報事項,其中Safer Care Victoria(SCV)的11類Sentinel Event (SE) 法定通報事件,可作為定義重大醫療事故(Never Events)時的參考,此外,澳洲由獨立單位負責根本原因分析調查,可作為臺灣推動之參考。結論:醫預法施行後仍需持續監測評估此一法定通報制度之成效,以達到預防及促進病人安全之目的。

英文摘要

Purpose: In Taiwan, over the past ten years, voluntary reporting (Taiwan Patient-safety Reporting system (TPR)) was encouraged as the strategy to improve the culture of patient safety. After the implementation of "" Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act"", any incidence meets the definition of ""Never Events"" will be subject to Mandatory Reporting System in the future. What will be the expected effects of changing this reporting system on improving medical quality and promoting patient safety? By comparing the reporting systems among countries will serve as the reference for Taiwan after implementation. Research methods: ""Document analysis"" and ""comparative study"" will be applied for this article. Result: To compare the discrepancy between Taiwan and the other countries, refer to the following: The development of Taiwan’s patient safety reporting system is similar to the model of the United Kingdom, gradually developing from voluntary to mandatory reporting; in Australia, local governments can define their own items for mandatory reporting, among which the 11 types of mandatory reporting Sentinel Event (SE) of Safer Care Victoria (SCV) can be used as the reference for the definition of Never Events, in addition, Australia has an independent unit responsible for Root Cause Analysis (RCA), which can be also used as the reference for Taiwan to promote RCA after the implementation of Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act. Conclusion: After the official implementation of Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution Act, it is necessary to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of this Mandatory Reporting system to establish the culture of patient safety in our country.

 

起訖頁 006-012
關鍵詞 醫療事故預防及爭議處理法法定通報重大醫療事故Medical Accident Prevention and Disputes Resolution ActMandatory ReportingNever Events
刊名 醫療品質雜誌  
期數 202401 (18:1期)
出版單位 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會
該期刊-下一篇 淺談醫預法下的醫療爭議調解制度
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄