月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
厦门大学法律评论 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
超級平臺利用數據實施自我優待行爲的規制研究
並列篇名
Research on the Regulation of Super Platform Using Data to Implement Self-preferential Behavior
作者 王俊 (Wang Jun)楊朋霖 (Yang Penglin)
中文摘要
對于超級平臺利用數據實施自我優待行為的必要性和正當性存在廣泛的爭議。在對超級平臺獲取數據和實施自我優待行為兩階段的特徵和性質進行分析的基礎上,發現相對于其它競爭相關法律制度,結合超級平臺的特徵和行為規制目的,《反壟斷法》是更為適當的規制路徑。然而,由于利用數據實施自我優待行為與反壟斷法中的類型化行為特徵不符,而適用兜底條款存在不確定性和濫用風險,因此,一方面,設定事前預防性監管措施,包括強化平臺內部規則和算法的“公平合理無歧視”審查,確保平臺內數據的可携性和互操作性,能够最大限度避免潜在排除、限制競爭效果的發揮;另一方面,考慮到行為具備的合理性和潜在的排除、限制競爭效果,確定具備可操作性和科學性的事後規制條件,包括分析數據利用是否超越合理邊界,從成本、收益和必要性三個方面評估超級平臺實施自我優待行為的動機,從而對超級平臺利用數據實施自我優待行為進行適當規制。
英文摘要
There are widespread debates about the necessity and legitimacy of super platforms using data to implement self-preferential behavior. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and nature of the two stages of data acquisition and self-preferential behavior of super platforms, it is found that, compared with other competition-related legal systems, anti-monopoly law is a more appropriate regulatory path. However, since the use of data to implement self-preferential behavior does not conform to the characteristics of typified behavior in the Anti-monopoly law, and there are uncertainties and risks of abuse in the application of catch-up clauses, therefore, on the one hand, it is necessary to set preventive regulatory measures in advance, including strengthening the review of the platform’s internal rules and algorithms with the "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory" to ensure the portability and interoperability of data in the platform, and can avoid potential exclusion and limit the effect of competition as much as possible; on the other hand, considering the rationality and potential exclusion and limitation of competition effects, it is necessary to determine operable and scientific post-regulatory conditions, including the analysis of whether the use of data exceeds the reasonable limit, and evaluate the motivation of super platforms to implement self-preferential behavior from the three aspects of cost, benefit and necessity, so as to appropriately regulate that super platform uses data to implement self-preferential treatment.
起訖頁 101-122
關鍵詞 超級平臺數據利用自我優待反壟斷規制Super PlatformData UtilizationSelf-preferencingAntitrust Regulations
刊名 厦门大学法律评论  
期數 202311 (36期)
出版單位 廈門大學法學院
DOI 10.53106/615471682023110036007   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 歐美大型科技公司數據隱私反壟斷規制爭議分析與啓示
該期刊-下一篇 屏蔽視頻廣告行爲正當性判定的理路反思
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄