月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
厦门大学法律评论 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
幫助犯問題的單一制體系方案
並列篇名
The Solution of Unitary System to the Problem of Accessory
作者 劉瑞杰
中文摘要
刑法總則明文規定幫助犯乃運用區分制方案處理幫助犯問題之前提。區分制方案固然能解决部分定罪處罰問題,却有不少理論缺陷。我國刑法總則不規定幫助犯,只能按照單一制方案處理幫助犯問題。區分制方案無法妥當解决的定罪處罰問題,按照單一制方案解釋我國刑法規定便迎刃而解。單一制方案不會前移未遂犯範圍和不必要地擴張刑罰。對於我國司法實務中幫助犯問題,運用單一制方案處理比運用區分制方案處理明顯更爲優越。
英文摘要
The way of according to the theory of “principal and accomplice dividing system” to deal with the problem of accessory is based on that the “accessory” (a type of criminal participation) has been clearly stipulated in the general rules of the criminal law. Although, to some extents, the solution of the theory of dividing system has solved some problems of conviction and punishment, meanwhile many new theoretical problems are brought by it. In view of the absence of provision of “accessory” in Chinese criminal law, the problem of accessory should be solved through the theory of the “unitary principal offender system”. The problems of conviction and punishment which cannot be solved through the theory of dividing system can be solved easily through the provisions of joint crime in Chinese criminal law and the interpretations of unitary principal offender system. Furthermore, the risk of expanding punishment scope of attempted offense can be improved and controlled. In terms of judicial practice, the application of the unitary principal offender system is also superior to the the theory of dividing system.
起訖頁 225-243
關鍵詞 幫助犯問題單一制體系區分制體系Problem of AccessoryUnitary SystemDividing System
刊名 厦门大学法律评论  
期數 202306 (35期)
出版單位 廈門大學法學院
DOI 10.53106/615471682023060035011   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 基本權利教義學中刑事訴訟法與憲法規範解釋的互動——以《憲法》第130條獲得辯護權條款爲例
該期刊-下一篇 權力結構是性騷擾行爲的必要不充分條件嗎?
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄