英文摘要 |
The emergence of artificial intelligence-generated works (AI-generated works) is challenging the originality and the authorship doctrines under the current copyright law and theory. By illustrating “what new activities or behaviors that people may perform,” “what new products people may make” and “what new relationship people may form” since AI art generators developed to the world, this article indicates the challenging questions for the existent copyright law are: “Whether an AI-generated work is copyrightable?” “Who is the author of the AI-generated work?” and “How to allocate the rights on the AI-generated work?” The first question shows the uncertainty of the current originality and authorship doctrines while facing such new type of works; it is the most fundamental issue need to be dealt with. To provide the potential approaches for AI-generated works for Taiwan to consider, this article introduces the approaches proposed by the U.S. legal scholars for improving the current originality doctrine and the authorship requirement, then apply those approaches to the existent three representative examples of AI-generated portraits to see whether an AI-generated work still can be attributed to a human author, and thus be a copyrightable work of authorship. In the end, this article proposes a preliminary suggestion for interpreting and applying the originality and authorship doctrines under the current Taiwan copyright law to tackle with AI-generated contents. |