PDCA循環問卷之信效度初步分析

Preliminary Analysis of the PDCA Cycle Questionnaire's Reliability and Validity

本研究自「Plan（計畫）、Do（執行）、Check（檢核）和Action（行動），簡稱為PDCA循環」之理論基礎概念與操作性定義，發展一套客觀且適合教育工作主管在檢視自我任務進度之評量問卷，並進行統計檢驗分析，其效度檢定各向度之α值從.660至.743；整體問卷之信度α值更高達.912。本研究以81名國中小學校之主管職為受試樣本，結果亦顯示「PDCA循環評量」問卷具有不錯的構念效度，同時也具有良好的內部一致性信度。整體來說，「PDCA循環評量」問卷具有良好的信效度，且係有實用價值的評量工具。依據研究結論，建議後續研究可以質化研究進行深度訪談，探索國內國中、小學校主管在行政與管理工作經驗上的規劃或以驗證性因素分析進一步驗證本問卷的因素結構。

 

This study adopted the basic concepts and operational definitions of the Plan, Do, Check, and Action (PDCA) questionnaire to develop an objective questionnaire suitable for educational supervisors to self-examine their task progress. According to statistical test analysis, in the validity test, the Cronbach’s α of each dimension ranged from .660 to .743; regarding reliability, the Cronbach’s α value of the overall questionnaire was .912. In total, 81 primary and secondary school supervisors were included in this study. The results demonstrated that the questionnaire has high construct validity and internal consistency, and the questionnaire is a practical evaluation tool. Follow-up studies should conduct qualitative research and in-depth interviews, explore the administrative and management experience of primary and secondary school supervisors, and verify the questionnaire’s structure through confirmatory factor analysis.