萊劑殘留標準的立法權限憲法爭議⎯⎯⎯⎯評111年憲判字第6號判決

Constitutional Dispute over the Legislative Authority of the Standard of Ractopamine Residues: Comments on the 111-Xian-Pan-6 Decision

111年憲判字第6號判決為憲法訴訟法施行後，憲法法庭就地方自治保障案件作出的首件判決。本案主要爭點有二：一、進口肉品及其產製品殘留乙型受體素的安全容許量標準，屬中央立法事項或地方立法事項？二、行政院就聲請人各地方議會，函告其所通過的各該自治條例無效或不予核定部分，是否逾越憲法賦予中央監督地方自治的權限範圍？

The 111-Xian-Pan-6 Decision was the first judgment made by the Constitutional Court on a case of local self-government protection after the implementation of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act. There are two main points of contention in this case: 1. Is the safety tolerance standard for residual β-receptor hormone in imported meat and its products a matter of central or local legislation? 2. The Executive Yuan inform the petitioners and local councils by letter that the self-government regulations passed by them are invalid or not approved. Does it exceed the scope of the central government’s authority to supervise local self-government under the Constitution?