近年來，由諸多文獻中發現在建築設計過程中以建築性能分析軟體輔助之相關議題，然而無論在業界實務端或學院教育，對於在設計流程中導入建築性能分析軟體的可信度、時間點、意願、操作流程及相關背景知識仍未成熟。因此，本研究著重於整合國內實務端設計工作流程與重點模擬分析項目，提出一套學習的參考架構，並對設計者進行教育訓練，以消弭設計階段應用分析軟體的障礙。本研究以7名建築系學生為對象，進行一學期的教育訓練實驗，透過問卷和訪談進行綜合性分析以評估訓練成效。實驗結果發現教育訓練具有良好成效，參與者對建築性能分析軟體的知識有顯著提升。雖然個體間學習成效存在差異（如參與者對技術易用性的認知不同），但對技術的價值認知與採納意願則皆有顯著提升。然而，建築能耗分析軟體被發現訓練成效不彰，可能歸因為該能源相關專業本身之複雜性，訓練時間不足，個體學習態度等，導致不容易在短期課程中立即獲得良好學習成效，其在設計中的應用也受到限制。藉此，本研究最後亦提出對未來建築學院在理論與分析軟體操作的整合課程建議，以協助學習者能夠循序漸進，有效的應用輔助分析軟體回饋建築設計。

Since the sustainable issue has become a trend in recent years, the adoption of building performance analysis (BPA) tools in design process is not a news today. However, according to the literature review revealing the “rule of thumb” was still the measure when architects discuss the green building design. Also, the lack of background knowledge could always be noticed between the intention of sustainability and design works in either academic education or design practice. Therefore, this study was started on the BPA software training course of basic knowledge and application through the early design phase. To close the gap, a guided workflow of BPA tools was proposed for the designer’s needs. The guided workflow was used to draft a pilot experiment course in architectural education with 7 trainees. In order to enhance students’ fundamental knowledge. The results of the experiment showed subjects have a significant improvement on the knowledge of BPA tools (p-value <0.05), nevertheless, energy simulation learning showed on the opposite. The results also indicated that the individual discrepancy might cause the effect on factor of “Perceived Ease of Use”. In conclusion, based on the results of experiment above, the grading course with learning objectives, training methods and contents have been modified and suggested.