| 英文摘要 |
Development of Floating Offshore Wind (FOW) farms requires identifying the most appropriate floater type for demo tests and commercial applications. Different types of floating concepts can be selected including semi-submersibles, barges, and Tension Leg Platforms (TLPs). Each type has its unique strengths and drawbacks. As-sessing their motion performance is essential for determining their feasibility. This research examines the motions of four floater designs: center-tower semi-submersible (inspired by VolturnUS), Side-tower semi-submersible (TaidaFloat), square barge with a moonpool (inspired by Ideol), and TLP (inspired by Float4Wind). The dimen-sions of each floater were calibrated to ensure some comparable characteristics. All models, designed to support a 15 MW wind turbine, underwent dynamic simulations using OrcaFlex under Design Load Cases 6.1, utilizing envi-ronmental data from offshore Hsinchu in the Taiwan Strait. Hydrostatic properties, hydrodynamic properties, and dynamic motion responses were assessed. The anal-ysis shows that while the TLP has smallest motions in heave and pitch, it allows excessive surge movements, potentially limiting its viability. The barge exhibits poor heave per-formance due to its large waterplane area that increases heave stiffness. Its heave natural period is adversely within the first-order wave excitation zone so that it has largest motions. Semi-submersibles offer a more balanced motion response overall. Between the two semis, TaidaFloat stands out for its excellent heave performance, while Voltur-nUS offers superior yaw stability under varying environmental conditions. Based on these results, semi-submersibles may be considered as the more suitable option for deployment in waters such as the Taiwan Strait. |