| 英文摘要 |
This study analyzes how corporate governance shapes shareholders’investment decisions through firms’choices of accounting conservatism. Firms are classified into two types according to their tolerance for conservatism: those with passive corporate governance and those with active corporate governance. Within a signaling framework, accounting conservatism affects investors’beliefs and, in turn, their investment levels. The model characterizes the conditions under which separating equilibrium, separating equilibrium with distortion, and pooling equilibrium emerge. The analysis yields four main results. First, a separating equilibrium arises when the intrinsically optimal level of accounting conservatism chosen by firms with passive corporate governance exceeds that of firms with active corporate governance. Second, when one type of firm generates both higher fixed and marginal benefits of accounting conservatism for shareholders than the other, a distorted separating equilibrium does not arise, and only a separating equilibrium is sustained. Third, a separating equilibrium with distortion emerges when the fixed benefit generated by one type exceeds a threshold relative to the other. Finally, when one type optimally mimics the other, a pooling equilibrium arises in which accounting choices no longer reveal firm types, and investors base their investment decisions on posterior beliefs inferred from observed accounting conservatism. |