| 英文摘要 |
Contemporary Indigenous art in Taiwan has followed the wave of cultural revitalization that emerged around the lifting of martial law in the 1980s. Over the subsequent three decades, shaped by the intersections of shifting historical consciousness and reinforced by state support, it has developed into a highly recognizable aesthetic and cultural phenomenon. Although it may appear as an autonomous field distinct from mainstream art history, this aesthetic domain is in fact rooted in complex historical and spatial conditions. Among these are its inevitable ties to the cultural actions and critical traditions led by the first generation of male Indigenous intellectuals at the end of the twentieth century, as well as the substantial expansion of the“mountain–sea”discourse they first introduced in the sphere of cultural production. In recent years, this discourse has been vividly materialized and transformed, most notably through the emergence, in the mid-2010s, of localized outdoor art festivals along Taiwan’s east coast, closely connected to Indigenous art communities. This article argues that the Indigenous“mountain–sea”symbolism, now a canonical image, was from the very beginning co-constructed with a certain masculine subjectivity under its specific historical conditions. The local art festivals that began in the mid-2010s—especially those centered on large-scale sculptures engaging directly with the landscape—further intensified this masculine aesthetic of mountains and seas. At the same time, however, with the full involvement of the modern state, these festivals have diverged more and more from the critical traditions once integral to earlier Indigenous cultural movements. Within this paradoxical context, the article seeks to reintroduce the long-neglected perspective of gender politics to the forefront of historical interpretation. Focusing on the Taiwan East Coast Land Art Festival, which emerged in the 2010s and has since had considerable influence, as well as several subsequent Indigenous art festivals, it examines how the works of Labay Eyong, Idas Losin, and Ciwas Tahos articulate female subjectivity or queer biopolitics in dialogue with the long-standing masculine tradition of Indigenous art. Through this engagement, the paper gradually outlines a tentative theoretical prototype of a“feminine sculpture”that is resistant, generative, and yet unresolved. |