| 中文摘要 |
The three-stage hypothesis about the relative chronology of tonogenesis in Chinese and Vietic posited in Alves (2018a) has raised significant hypotheses concerning the Early Sino-Vietnamese strata and their Sinitic etyma. On the basis of an extended dataset, this study aims to reexamine the relevant hypothesis, particularly the Vietnamese marked Pingsheng (i.e., ngang/huyền) reflexes for Middle Chinese Qusheng items, and modify it with more phonological evidence and implications, including a finer-grained stratification of Sinitic loans found in Vietnamese. |