| 英文摘要 |
Certifications signifying eco-friendliness or sustainability are indispensable for choosing products that align with the green consumerism ideal. Yet a flurry of dubious certifications has emerged to take advantage of consumers’reliance and trust, with many examples of certification organizations not performing audits according to their pronounced standards, conflicts-of-interest between auditors and auditees, and certification standards simply being too lenient to ensure green-ness. This article discusses pathways to correct these missteps and encourage better certification systems, referring first to U.S. and EU developments for guidance. The U.S. has mainly observed a“bottom-up”approach where consumers bring litigation against merchants displaying certifications. This article is the first to collect a series of cases with this effort to show that the current consumer protection legal framework might compromise plaintiffs’claims. This article also reviews a“top-down”approach of targeting certifications taken by the EU with new unfair business practice regulations to fill in a gap in our domestic literature. In Taiwan, certifications involve at least three distinct fields: consumer protection, endorsement rules in the Fair Trade Act, and perhaps surprisingly, certification mark rules in trademark law. This article further provides suggestions to strengthen these legal regimes, lending from both the“bottom-up”and“top-down”approaches with hope of making certifications truly reliable and trustworthy. |