| 英文摘要 |
The principle of non bis in idem (prohibition of double punishment) in China's administrative penalties has undergone a transformation from a procedural law principle to a substantive law principle, leading to conceptual confusion and difficulties in practical application. Non bis in idem is originally a procedural law principle, tracing its roots to the Roman law doctrine of ne bis in idem. It possesses independent status and value and should not be conflated with substantive law principles such as the proportionality of punishment or with theories concerning the determination of the number of administrative violations. From the perspectives of conserving administrative resources, maintaining legal certainty, and protecting individuals from repeated penalties, it is necessary to restore the procedural law-based understanding of non bis in idem in the administrative penalty system. The precondition for applying this principle is the repeated exercise of punitive power by administrative authorities. The term“one matter”refers to the same illegal act committed by the same person that has already been definitively addressed in a prior administrative penalty decision.“No repeated punishment”means that administrative authorities shall not repeatedly exercise their punitive power over the same matter. In situations where the administrative authority fails to exercise its punitive power correctly or completely, exceptions to non bis in idem may be permitted. However, such exceptions must still be subject to the restrictions imposed by public interest considerations, the prohibition of unfavorable changes for individuals, and statutory time limits for penalty revocation or alteration. |